Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Otto Virtanen vs Jan Choinski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Virtanen vs Choinski analysis and find out who is favored!
Otto Virtanen vs Jan Choinski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Virtanen 0 - 0 Choinski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Virtanen has won 47.24% of points on his second serve, while Choinski has won 52.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Virtanen, in recent form, has won 51.66% of his opponent's second serve points, while Choinski has won 49.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.08% and 29.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Virtanen has saved 59.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Choinski has saved 63.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Virtanen has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 36/ 28), with Choinski winning 46.15% (W/L 30/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Virtanen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 111/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 15/ 20). Choinski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 199/ 119), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Virtanen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/ 17), where as Choinski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Virtanen has played against opponents with an average rank of 234.2 while Choinski has played against players with an average rank of 250.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Virtanen has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Choinski has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Virtanen has converted 43.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Choinski has converted 44.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Virtanen 0 - 0 Choinski
158
Rank
109
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
181
Rank
126
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
60% (182-122)
Career Total W/L
59% (358-245)
65% (20-11)
YTD W/L
42% (11-15)
$146,665
Career Prize Money
$185,015
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Otto Virtanen | Jan Choinski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (20/11) | 42% (11/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (43/27) | 48% (29/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (352/321) | 51% (302/285) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 54% (7/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 94% (16/1) | 30% (3/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 252 | 117 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 127 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:13 | 1:44:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 232.16 | 259.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1264/2151) | 67% (1264/1899) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (910/1264) | 69% (871/1264) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (414/887) | 53% (335/635) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (92/211) | 45% (69/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (806/2055) | 37% (696/1868) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 63% (5/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (17/8) | 35% (6/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (19/30) | 42% (11/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (9/12) | 31% (4/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 22% (2/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 6% (16/1) |
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Otto Virtanen
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Otto Virtanen
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
56 of
122)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
15
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
50 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Otto Virtanen
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Otto Virtanen
79%
(
70 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
1
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
44 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Jurij Rodionov
89%
(
77 of
87)
1st Serve %
100%
(
78 of
78)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
70 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
119)
16
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
127
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
17 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jan Choinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Jan Choinski
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Tristan Boyer
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Zachary Svajda
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Jan Choinski
47%
(
39 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Benjamin Hassan
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
6 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Jan Choinski
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
83 of
119)
21
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
54 of
83)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
26%
(
25 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(7) 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Henri Haupt
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jan Choinski
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Joao Fonseca
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Duarte Vale
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
11
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Virtanen Vs Choinski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
